(1) The amendment bears a substantial relation to the public health, safety, or welfare;

(2) The amendment is warranted because of changed circumstances or because of a need for additional property in the proposed Comprehensive Plan designation or because the proposed amendment is appropriate for reasonable development of the subject property;

(3) The subject property is suitable for development in conformance with standards under the proposed Comprehensive Plan designation;

(4) The amendment will not be materially detrimental to uses or property in the immediate vicinity of the subject property;

(5) The proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment has merit and value for the community as a whole; and

(6) The proposed amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. (Ord. 1110 § 3, 2002; Ord. 1025, 1998).